Putin Becomes Europe's 20th Century Menace

by John M. Curtis
(310) 204-8700

Copyright November 13, 2014
All Rights Reserved.
                                    

                Russia’s 62-year-old Vladimir Putin has become Europe’s new 21st Century menace, starting Aug. 8, 2008 rolling Russian tanks to seize Georgia’s South Ossetia and Abkhazia.  While Republicans point fingers at President Barack Obama for a feckless foreign policy, former President George W. Bush and his hawkish Vice President Dick Cheney sat idly by while Russia seized sovereign Georgian territory.  With an unfettered military buildup over the last six years, Putin seized Crimea March 1, all but taking over Southeastern Ukraine.  Slapped by the U.S and European Union economic and travel sanctions, Putin hasn’t stopped his aggression, moving more Russian troops and military hardware into Luhansk and Donetsk.  U.S. and EU officials haven’t figured out what to do to stop Putin from seizing more sovereign land, ceding Moscow without resistance more Ukrainian territory.

            Putin has 100% Kremlin backing while he morphed Russia from an international economic partner to a pariah state, prompting at least eight European nations to beef up their militaries to contain a growing Russian threat.  Former Soviet satellites in Northern Europe, including Poland, Nordic and Baltic states fear that Moscow could arbitrarily decide to reclaim Russian territory before the Soviet collapse Dec. 25, 1991.  U.S. and the EU have applied harsh economic and travel sanctions, driving the Russian ruble and stock market to multiyear lows.  British Defense Secretary Michael Fallon found Russia “regularly flouting the rules of international aviation,” flying Russian strategic bombers into European airspace.  Putin’s growing show of force is designed to intimidate Europe, warning former Soviet republics that Mother Russia could once again takeover Eastern Europe.

             Standing up to Russia is no easy matter for the EU, concerned more with growing unemployment and struggling economies.  German Chancellor Angela Merkel has shown some backbone, backing the U.S. and EU economic sanctions that has Putin scrambling to put energy deals together in China.  At an Asian-Pacific economic summit in Beijing Nov. 8, Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping inked a $70 billion natural gas pipeline designed to supply China enough natural gas for decades.  Looking to compensate for unfavorable economic conditions in Europe, Putin showed his savvy business side, looking to replace lost European revenue.  “NATO has recorded over 100 intercepts so far this year, three times as many as in 2013 and the years is not yet finished,” said Fallon, proving that Putin continues to intimidate Europe, especially former Soviet republics, with military maneuvers.

             Europe ignored Putin’s Trojan Horse becoming too dependent on Russian petroleum and natural gas, giving Moscow too much clout to meddle in European politics.  If China makes the same mistake, they’ll find out the like Europe what it’s like to extricate itself from Kremlin dependence.  Northern European countries led by Scandinavia and Baltic States recall Kremlin intimidation during the Cold War.  When former Soviet Premier Mikhail Gorbachev warned Nov. 11 of a new Cold War, he took no responsibility for Putin’s aggression.  He’s been quoted recently as backing Putin’s moves in Ukraine, pointing fingers at the U.S. for meddling in Russian affairs.  Moscow blames the U.S. for Kiev’s Feb. 22 coup that toppled the pro-Moscow government of Viktor Yanukovich.  Moscow won’t concede that former Soviet satellites want to remain independent of Moscow.

           U.S. foreign policy under Obama has tilted isolationist, ending foreign wars and avoiding playing world policeman.  Obama’s strategic retreat sent the wrong message to the Kremlin and Islamic radicals that the U.S. would no longer confront new 21st Century threats.  Obama disagreed with 2012 GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney when he said the Moscow was still the U.S.’s biggest threat.  Putin turned back the clock on 40 years of U.S.-Russian relations, under Gorbachev and his successor the late Russian President Boris Yeltsin, creating the most adversarial relationship since the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis. With a new GOP Senate sworn in January, confronting Moscow will become a priority on Capitol Hill.  Gone are the days when Obama gets a free pass on U.S. foreign policy.  Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz) will offer a different approach when he takes over the Armed Services Committee Jan. 1.

             Putin’s seizure of Crimea threw U.S. and EU policymakers for a loop.  After building up his conventional land army, Putin has no rival on the European continent, giving former Soviet satellites and neighboring states reason to sweat.  “Military aggression against Ukraine was foreseen by very few policymakers.  The warning time has been reduced to virtually zero,” said Estonian Defense Minister Sven Mikser, exposing Europe’s vulnerability to Putin’s superior military.  Under McCain’s leadership, he’s not going to cede Putin a free ride in Eastern and Western Europe.  “We will not allow Russia to invade our air space,” said Fallon, agreeing that something must be done to contain Putin’s aggression.  “We are in a new stage of our relationship with Russia, that is very clear:  Russia has stepped outside the framework of international law,” said Fallon, calling for action.

 About the Author 

John M. Curtis writes politically neutral commentary analyzing spin in national and global news.  He's editor of OnlineColumnist.com.and author of Dodging the Bullet and Operation Charisma.


Homecobolos> Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular">©1999-2005 Discobolos Consulting Services, Inc.
(310) 204-8300
All Rights Reserved.