ISIS Lashes Out at Kurds After Air Strikes

by John M. Curtis
(310) 204-8700

Copyright September 24 2014
All Rights Reserved.
                                    

           Warned that air strikes alone won’t defeat 44-year-old Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, President Obama went ahead Sept. 22 with targeted bombings in Syria.  Hitting the al-Qaeda offshoot called Khorasan Group for allegedly planning attacks on Western targets, Obama didn’t consider expected repercussions on the ground in Iraq and Syria.  While joined by Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, the U.S. finds itself doing the heavy lifting again battling a shadowy enemy that’s already seized some 30% of Iraq and Syrian territory.  What the White House didn’t expect was the backlash on indigenous populations, especially the Kurds, from Obama’s decision to destroy ISIS.  Without assets on the ground, there’s no stopping ISIS from more beheadings, mafia-style executions and mayhem on local Kurdish populations.

             Stretched too thin to defend their own people over large areas of Iraq and Syria, the Kurd’s Peshmerga fighters are a shell of their former selves when they once battled Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein.  Saddam burnished his reputation as brutal tyrant gassing some 5,000 Kurds with VX, Sarin and mustard gas in the Iranian border town of Halabja March 16, 1988.  Despised by Iraq, Turkey and Iran, the Kurds have sustained more than their share of indignity, only recently recognized by the U.S. as an autonomous and independent region.  While Obama recently decided to arm the Kurds directly to protect their towns and villages from ISIS, the necessary hardware, training and reinforcements have left many Kurdish towns and villages undefended.  ISIS lashing out at the beleaguered Kurds poses problems for Obama’s strategy, potentially causing a civilian massacre without boots on the ground.

             Reporting a build up of ISIS fighters at the Kurdish border town of Kobani, Ocalan Iso, deputy leader of Kurdish forces defending Kobani at the Turkish border, expressed concerns about a potential massacre.  “”The number of their fighters has increased, the number of their tanks has increased since the bombardment of Raqqa,” said Iso, worried that ISIS was preparing to attack.  “Kobani is in danger,” watching thousands of Kurds try to flee across the Turkish border.  After ISIS attacked Kobani last week, over 140,000 Kurds have been driven out of their homes, creating a humanitarian crisis.  Bombarding ISIS positions from the air won’t stop a ground assault that could wipeout thousands of Kurdish civilians.  Iso estimated that ISIS fighter were some 8 km [5 miles] from Kobani, begging the U.S. to redouble its air assault.  Obama must do more or face blood on U.S. hands.

             When Obama decided to start bombing ISIS Aug. 8 to stop a potential genocide on Iraq’s ancient Yazidis, he realized that he could no longer ignore ISIS.  Watching U.S. photojournalist James Foley beheaded Aug. 19 on YouTube changed Obama’s thinking about U.S. intervention.  While Barack agreed with his Pentagon advisors to begin an air campaign against ISIS, it’s becoming obvious that ground troops are necessary.  Watching ISIS retaliate against the Kurds for U.S. air strikes makes a strong case for having some boots on the ground.  “We call on American forces to hit their positions.  They are 8 km from Kobani.  They were 25 km away before,” said Iso, while the reports could not be independently verified.  U.S. officials knew that their bombing campaign would have serious consequences to indigenous populations, prompting ISIS to massacred more civilians.

                 Whether or not the U.S. and its allies can “destroy” ISIS is anyone’s guess.  At some point, it’s likely ISIS will be driven into asymmetric [guerilla] warfare, abandoning seized territories and vowing to fight like the Taliban in Afghanistan.  As U.S. air strikes hit their targets, it’s likely ISIS, like the al-Qaeda affiliate Khorasan, will retreat from entrenched positions and take their fight elsewhere.  “Because of the bombing in Raqqa, Islamic State has take all of their weapons and brought them here.  There are more Islamic fighters in the laws two days, they have brought all their forces,” said 60-year-old Ahmed Hassan, a Syrian Kurd who fled to Turkey.  Obama’s plan to only hit ISIS by air endangers Kurds and other folks in the region.  Only U.S. ground troops can help prevent the kind of massacres that are taking place as ISIS becomes more desperate with a relentless aerial assault.

             White House officials need to urgently recalculate the current bomb-only mission and consider the consequences on local populations.  Watching the Kurds scrambling, running for their lives underscores the adverse fallout to the current air campaign.  “They have heavy weapons.  We are running away from them.  YPG [Peoples Protection Units] haven’t got heavy weapons.  That’s why we need help,” said Hassan, urging the U.S. and allies to arm the Kurds directly.  Before the world watches another ISIS massacre, Obama must urgently consider deploying U.S. ground troops to protect against another genocide.  Iraq’s beleaguered military is in no position to protect the Kurds, while they face ISIS encroachment on Baghdad.  Without U.S. ground forces, the current aerial campaign could wind up harming local populations.  Once ISIS realizes they‘re under relentless attack, they’ll lash out at local groups.

John M. Curtis writes politically neutral commentary analyzing spin in national and global news.  He's editor of OnlineColumnist.com.and author of Dodging the Bullet and Operation Charisma.


Homecobolos> Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular">©1999-2005 Discobolos Consulting Services, Inc.
(310) 204-8300
All Rights Reserved.