Crackdown in Ferguson Cause More Violence

by John M. Curtis
(310) 204-8700

Copyright August 19, 2014
All Rights Reserved.
                                    

             Calling in the National Guard to Ferguson, Missouri, local authorities hoped to send a loud message to protesters seeking justice in the wake of 18-year-old Michael Brown fatal shooting Aug. 9 by 28-year-old four-year-police veteran Darren Wilson.  Civil rights activists, led by Rev. Al Sharpton and Rev. Jesse Jackson, were troubled by a private autopsy conducted at the request of the Brown family by renowned forensic pathologists Dr. Michael Baden.  Baden’s autopsy showed that Brown was shot at least six times by Wilson Aug. 9 at 12:01, in what looks to civil rights activists as more than police brutality.  Nightly protests have raged on for nine days, encouraged by civil rights activists before Ferguson Police to release a complete record on the incident.  Ferguson authorities have released piecemeal facts about the police shooting, essentially blaming Brown for Wilson’s shooting.

             Baden’s autopsy raises many possible scenarios, including Wilson was trigger happy, panicked or killed Brown execution-style while surrendering.  Pointing to a bullet wound on the top of Brown’s head raises the possibility of a cold blooded killing.  Calling Wilson’s shooting self-defense harks back to the Feb. 26, 2012 Trayvon Martin case where a 17-year-old Black teenager was shot by 29-year-old neighborhood watch guy George Zimmerman.  Zimmerman invoked Florida’s controversial “Stand-Your-Ground” law to justify killing Martin—something the Ferguson Police have used in Brown’s shooting.   What made Brown’s shooting suspicious are the multiple gunshot wounds and reluctance of the Police to release a full transcript of the Aug. 9 incident.  Failure to get the facts out quickly have raised concerns about the police sanitizing the official incident report.

             Ferguson police officials blame the unrest on outside agitators hurling plastic water bottles and Molotov cocktails into riot-clad officers ready to move quickly to crack down on demonstrators.  Whether admitted to or not, the Ferguson unrest stems from the Black community’s refusal to cow to a racist police department, busy obscuring the real facts.  With eyewitnesses saw Brown gunned down in cold blood, the Ferguson police have done little to dispel that narrative.  Keeping the facts from the public adds to suspicions that Ferguson Police violated Brown’s civil rights..  With President Barack Obama directing the Justice Department to order an independent autopsy, it looks like the DOJ sees grounds for a civil rights inquiry.  Given the preliminary autopsy results, a St. Louis grand jury could be looking into whether Wilson should be charged with murder and other civil rights violations

          Using armored personnel carriers and other equipment designed for domestic terrorism, President Barack Obama cautioned Ferguson Police and Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon not to use excessive force to compromise First Amendment right of protesters.  “There’s no excuse for excessive force by police or any action that denies people to protest peacefully,” said Obama, putting Missouri officials on notice that he’s looking carefully at their tactics.  Responding to any minor provocation, like hurlings Costco-brand water bottles, doesn’t give Nixon or Ferguson police the right to call out the National Guard.  Apart from a few bad apples, protests have been nonviolent.  Calling out the National Guard looks like overkill for Nixon, concerned that Ferguson protesters could get out of hand.  Obama has been accused of sitting squarely on the fence, not criticizing Ferguson’s law enforcement.

           Calling in the National Guard looks excessive when you consider the small two-block radius of Ferguson street protests.  Firing teargas and smoke-bombs to break up crowds looks like Ferguson law enforcement aims to stop lawful First Amendment rights to assembly by lawful protesters.  Before all the facts are known, the Black community has a right to protest what they regard as civil rights violations.  National civil rights activists like Sharpton and Jackson have good sense when ordinary police shooting crosses the line into a civil rights violation.  “Let’s seek to heal rather that to wound each other,” said Obama hoping to contain escalating violence but saying little about how racial minorities are often discriminated against by the criminal justice system.  Minorities—especially Blacks—are disproportionately represented in the U.S. prison population.

           Attorney Gen. Eric Holder should launch a Justice Department investigation into discriminatory practices at the Ferguson Police Department.  Failing to get the facts out about Brown’s Aug. 9 shooting has left the Black community skeptical that the Brown family can get justice Ferguson.  Missouri Gov. Nixon called in the National Guard not to contain escalating violence but to give local law enforcement cover against accusations of racial bias and discrimination.  Using armored personnel carriers and other riot gear used to combat domestic terrorism throws gasoline on an otherwise volatile situation.  Gunning down an 18-year-old in broad daylight raises disturbing questions about how and when the Ferguson Police should use lethal force.  Shooting an unarmed Black teenager at least six times without any real probable cause other that self-defense raises real questions about civil rights violations.

About the Author

John M. Curtis writes politically neutral commentary analyzing spin in national and global news.  He's editor of OnlineColumnist.com.and author of Dodging the Bullet and Operation Charisma.


Homecobolos> Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular">©1999-2005 Discobolos Consulting Services, Inc.
(310) 204-8300
All Rights Reserved.