Obama Plays Ostrich in Border Crisis

by John M. Curtis
(310) 204-8700

Copyright July 15, 2014
All Rights Reserved.
                                    

             Facing a tidal wave of children crossing from Mexico into the United States, President Barack Obama wants to punt the problem back to Congress for its lack of action on immigration reform.  Whatever Obama’s political problems in a Republican-controlled House, the president must confront waves of illegal child immigration sweeping the U.S. borders.  Meeting with Texas Gov. Rick Perry July 9 to discuss the flood of illegal child immigrants across the El Paso border, Texas, Obama agreed to ask Congress for $3.7 billion for more enforcement along the 200-mile-long Texas-Mexico border.  Obama ruffled many liberal feathers suggesting that the recent flood of illegal immigrants should be deported back to their host countries in Central America.  “He feels intensely a responsibility to prevent an even greater humanitarian crisis,” said White Domestic Policy Chief Cecilia Munoz.

             Today’s Central American refugees are being treated differently that some 500,000 Cubans granted asylum fleeing from Castro’s Cuba in 1959.  When the Cuban Mariel boatlift resumed giving another 124,000 Cubans asylum between April and September 1980, no one squawked about an immigration or border crisis requiring billions to beef up the Southern U.S. border.  What made Cuban immigration legal in the U.S. was not the way in which they arrived [on rickety boats and makeshift rafts] but the fact that they were refugees from Castro’s communist regime.  Under former President George W. Bush’s 2008 anti-trafficking law passed by Congress the Immigration and Naturalization Service must grant asylum to children caught up in their country’s drug wars.  Certainly the children fleeing from gang-war-torn Central America qualifies them for political asylum.

             When Obama refused to visit the border July 8, he caused a big stir suggesting the problem didn’t need another “photo-op.”  Going to the border, like other disaster areas, isn’t for the purpose of photo-ops but rather to underscore symbolically the president’s commitment to fixing the problem.  Pointing fingers at Obama for not fixing the immigration problems is like the kettle calling the pot black.  Whether it’s an election year or not, Congress kicking the immigration can down the road helps no one, especially the thousands of children now stuck in detention centers with Obama threatening to deport them back to their war-ravaged countries.  Shipping children back to their host countries would place them in harm’s way again, violating every international treaty protecting the rights of children.  Whether easy or not, deporting children doesn’t conform to international norms.

             Lecturing Latin American parents to stop sending their children North for a better life in the States is no substitute for realistic immigration policy.  “While we intend to do the right thing by these children, their parents need to know this is a dangerous situation and it is unlikely their children will be able to stay,” Obama said while meeting with Perry July 9.  Hoping Perry can somehow influence House Republicans on immigration reform is wishful thinking.  With or without Congress, the U.S. Justice Department under Eric Holder must apply the laws appropriately, especially the 2008 anti-trafficking law that grants asylum to children caught in the crosshairs of civil and drug wars.  If Central American parents believe they’re protecting their children to get them out local violence then they’re doing their job as parents.  White House officials need to study the current border crisis more carefully before deportations.

             Since October 2013, about 52,000 Central American children have cross the U.S. border into Texas.  Perry wants Obama to ask Congress for $4 billion in extra border enforcement.  Beefing up the border, while needed to prevent other undesirables—possibly Mideast terrorists—from threatening the U.S. homeland, doesn’t solve the problems of intolerable living conditions in gang-war ravaged Central America.  Pope Francis urged the world community to help Central American countries resolve the conflict that currently plagues the region.  Since Obama has no magic wand, either for Central America or the U.S. Border Patrol, the president must deal with 52,000 orphans unable to fend for themselves.  “It is contrary to everything we stand for as a people to try to summarily send children back to death . . . “ said Gov. Martin O’Malley (D-Md.), opposed to Obama’s deportation strategy.

             Looking back at mass waves of past Cuban immigration, it’s inconceivable that deportation is the answer to the current Central American child immigration crisis.  Bush’s 2008 anti-trafficking law gives child-victims of drug and civil wars the right to U.S. asylum.  Unless Congress amends that law, Obama has no choice but to grant the children the same status as generations of Cubans that floated on rafts and rickety boats to reach Key West.  While the GOP tabloid press tries to make political hay before the Midterm elections, the president must apply the law as its stands to deal with today’s immigration crisis.  If Congress wishes to make it more difficult for human smugglers to penetrate the U.S. border, then they should pony up resources to the Border Patrol.  Before the White House and Congress can agree on immigration reform, laws related to political asylum mist be applied.

John M. Curtis writes politically neutral commentary analyzing spin in national and global news.  He's editor of OnlineColumnist.com.and author of Dodging the Bullet and Operation Charisma.


Homecobolos> Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular">©1999-2005 Discobolos Consulting Services, Inc.
(310) 204-8300
All Rights Reserved.