Iraq at Critical Fork with U.S. Holding the Cards

by John M. Curtis
(310) 204-8700

Copyright June 21, 2014
All Rights Reserved.
                                     

           Faced with an ominous terrorist threat now approaching Baghdad, 63-year-old U.S.-backed Iraqi President Nouri al-Malki formally asked President Barack Obama for military strikes against the Islamic State of Iraq and [Syria] the Levant [ISIS], the al-Qaeda affiliated group formed by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.  Before killed by U.S. forces June 7, 2006, the Syrian-born Zarqawi tormented U.S. and Iraq forces, routinely blowing up mosques, beheading foreigners and stringing up U.S. soldiers on bridges during the bloody battles of Fallujah.  Letting Baghdad fall to al-Zarqawi’s terror group would be an insult to every Iraq War dead or veteran now battling disabling injuries and psychological scars.  Whatever went right or wrong with the Iraq War before Obama ended it Dec. 15, 2011, former Iraq Commander David Petraeus urged the White House to resume targeted air strikes on key ISIS targets.

             Ending the Iraq War Dec. 15 almost three years after taking office, Obama understood the hopeless situation which pitted Iraq’s dominant Shiite population against Sunis and Kurds.  Back in 2006, former Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.) urged former President George W. Bush to consider cleaving Iraq in Southern, Central and Northern zones, roughly corresponding to Shiite, Sunni and Kurdish populations.  No one took Biden seriously then but their singing his praises now.  Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, in a major policy pivot, expressed for the first time openness to splitting Iraq along ethnic lines.  Once strongly opposed to any divisions in Iraq to prevent the Kurds from declaring an independent Kurdistan, Erdogan has come 180 degrees, now seeing Iraq as hopelessly embroiled in a sectarian war with Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds unable to live under one roof.

             U.S. officials blamed the al-Maliki Shiite government for offering Kurds and Sunnis no reason to back the Baghdad government.  State Department officials have begged al-Malki to make more concessions to Sunnis and Kurds.  While it’s easy to point fingers, the latest ISIS insurgency that heads toward Baghdad couldn’t have been stopped, no matter how many Sunnis or Kurds in al-Maliki’s government.  “The federal state [in Iraq] has not brought stability, so we have to discus a new system, either confederation or division,” said Veysel Ayhan, director of the Ankara-based think than International Middle East Peace Research Center. Since the U.S. Iraq War toppled Saddam Hussein April 12, 2003, Turkey reluctantly accepted the Shiite-dominated U.S.-backed government of Nour al-Malki installed May 30, 2006.  Biden had strong reservations about Saddam’s Sunni Baathists supporting the government.

             Since the new wave of Islamic extremism threatened Iraq’s central government, conservatives on Capitol Hill have pointed fingers at President Barack Obama for ending the war prematurely Dec. 15, 2011.  Speaking on Fox News June 19 to Megyn Kelly, former Vice President Dick Cheney and his conservative pundit daughter Elizabeth ripped Obama for ending the war prematurely and letting ISIS get out of hand.  Cheney and Liz blasted Obama June 18 in an Wall Street Journal oped, saying his foreign policy could not be any more wrong.  Kelly snapped back telling Cheney maybe he got the policy wrong on Iraq.   Cheney and other conservatives on Capitol Hill know that no terrorism existed in Iraq under Saddam.  Once toppled, the Bush administration had no plan for the power vacuum that opened up the floodgate into Iraq of Islamic extremism other than an open-ended war.

             After nearly nine years, Obama fulfilled a campaign promise three years after the fact ending the Iraq War Dec. 15, 2011.  No one other than Cheney and a few diehard necons believe that the Iraq War did anything good for U.S. national security or Mideast stability.  “It has been clear for us that Iraq has practically become divided into three parts,” said Huseyin Celik, a spokesman for Erdogan’s ruling Justice and Development Party [AKP], referring to Shiite, Sunni and Kurdish areas.  With ISIS taking over oil rich Mosul in the Kurdish North, even the most dovish voices on Capitol Hill can’t back an Islamic takeover in Iraq.  Despite Erdogan’s reluctance to ceded any semi-autonomy to Iraq’s Kurds, his recognition of Biden’s once farfetched fix sounds more practical and doable.  It took years before all the warring factions signed onto the Dayton Agreement Dec. 14, 1996 ending the Bosnian war.

            While there are differences between Bosnia-Herzegovina and Iraq, former President Bill Clinton helped broker an almost impossible end to the three-year long Bosnian War [1992-1995], culminating in the Dayton power-sharing agreement.  Whatever happens now in Iraq, the U.S. and NATO partners must beat back the current ISIS insurgency, handing control of Mosul back to the Kurds and rid Tikrit and Baqubah of ISIS influence.  Once contained, an international force can maintain the peace while a new power-sharing government can be put into place.  “We must realize that ISIS poses a threat not only to Iraq but to the UK and other countries as well,” said Petraeus, backing White House and Pentagon plans to neutralize ISIS.  Once ISIS has been neutralized, the U.N. needs to convene a conference on Iraq to figure out the right power-sharing arrangement that works.

John M. Curtis writes politically neutral commentary analyzing spin in national and global news.  He's editor of OnlineColumnist.com.and author of Dodging the Bullet and Operation Charisma.


Homecobolos> Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular">©1999-2005 Discobolos Consulting Services, Inc.
(310) 204-8300
All Rights Reserved.