Shelly's Sterling's Quick Clippers Sale Hits a Snag

by John M. Curtis
(310) 204-8700

Copyright June 9, 2014
All Rights Reserved.
                                    

                Clippers’ owner 80-year-Donald Sterling’s attorney Maxwell Blecher threw a monkey wrench into his wife Shelly Sterling’s sale of the team today notifying the NBA that the deal’s off.  Shelly made a quick-and-dirty deal June 4 with former 58-year-old Microsoft billionaire CEO Steve Balmer.  NBA officials headed by Adam Silver quickly rubber stamped the deal made by Shelly without her husband’s signature, officially removed May 31 because of mental “incapacitation,” triggering a condition in the Sterling Family Trust for Shelly to remove Donald as co-trustee.  When she struck the deal with Balmer June 4, Shelly believed she had the sole authority to consummate the $2 billion deal without her husband’s signature.  Donald’s not-so-young attorney now says his client won’t sell the team.  Blecher now says Sterling’s $1 billion lawsuit against the NBA goes forward. 

             Racing into probate court, Shelly hopes to get a judge to allow the sale to proceed per the conditions of the estate agreement without Donald’s signature.  Blecher contends that Donald’s 14 th Amendment rights to due process have been compromised first by V. Stiviano’s unlawful secret recording and now Shelly’s mental evaluation performed at Cedars Sinai Medical Center indicating that the octogenarian suffered from some kind of cognitive impairment, perhaps Alzheimer’s disease.  Blecher denied his client is mentally impaired suggesting that his own psychiatrists would give a very different picture of Donald’s mental health.  Blecher apparently didn’t see CNN’s Anderson Copper’s May 12 interview that showcased on national TV Sterling’s undeniable cognitive impairments.  Since the story of Sterling’s racist remarks went viral on TMZ Sports April 26, Sterling has dropped off the media radar.

             Sterling’s disappearance, reemergence on CNN and now disappearance again, speaks volumes about his inability to speak to the public because of cognitive impairments.  Blecher’s self-serving suggesting that Sterling’s not that far off completely ignores the reports of two Cedar Sinai neurologists or neuro-psychologists indicating the Sterling indeed suffers from cognitive impairment.  Racing back to court, Shelly hopes to have a judge reconfirm the Trust’s provision that removes Donald because of mental incapacity.  There’s no way any probate judge can do what Shelly wants without more thorough neurological examinations.  Blecher’s correct to say that Sterling’s own handpicked neurologist or even an independently-appointed one could come to different conclusions.  Sterling’s cognitive impairments could be at a stage where honest professionals see things differently.

             “The team is not for sale,” Blecher said June 9, signaling that Sterling’s $1 billion lawsuit against the NBA goes forward.  Citing Sterling’s former mistress’s illegal recordings, Blecher contends that the NBA had no grounds for Commissioner Silver to fine Sterling $2.5 million and ban him for life.  What Blecher doesn’t get is that the NBA has a right under its constitution to terminate any owner, player, coach or anyone else for harming the NBA brand.  Sterling’s racist rant, whether legally or illegally recorded, can’t be removed from the public record.  When the NBA Players Assn. threatened to boycott the playoff, Silver was forced to apply Sterling’s lifetime ban.  Sterling tried to apologize for his tirade in Cooper’s interview, only to hurt his credibility lashing out at Earvin “Magic” Johnson.  By the time Cooper’s interview ended, he left little doubt about Sterling’s mental incompetence.

             Cooper himself concurred with Blecher but for all the wrong reasons.  He knew as a journalist it breached any sense of ethics to interview someone cognitively impaired.  “I have decided that I must fight to protect my rights,” Sterling said through his attorney.  “While my position may not be popular, I believe that my rights to privacy and the preservation of my right to due process should not be trampled,” going back to the same empty arguments.  Blecher knows that his client is part of a private franchise organization that reserves the rights, without litigation, to terminate ownership agreements if they damage the league.  Sterling’s ugly rant caused cancellations of numerous sponsors unwilling to do business with the Clippers or the NBA.  Sterling hasn’t had his 14th Amendment rights compromised, he’s sold his team for a whopping profit because of the NBA’s successful brand.

             Rushing to probate court, Shelly could open up a can of worms regarding the mental incapacity of her 80-year-old estranged husband.  While it’s true that the Sterling Family Trust—as most trusts—can change trustees due to incapacity, Sterling’s cognitive decline falls into a murky zone where honest professionals could disagree about Sterling’s disability.  Shelly’s contention that two neurological reports render Donald incapacitated for the purposes of serving as trustee can be contested easily.  What can’t be contested is Sterling’s breach of his NBA franchise agreement that permits the league to terminate the agreement without notice for harming the league.  Whatever Sterling’s mental state, the NBA has a right to terminate his franchise agreement for harming the league.  Whatever Sterling’s 14th amendment rights, they have nothing to do with selling the Clippers for fair-market-value.

John M. Curtis writes politically neutral commentary analyzing spin in national and global news.  He's editor of OnlineColumnist.com.and author of Dodging the Bullet and Operation Charisma.


Homecobolos> Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular">©1999-2005 Discobolos Consulting Services, Inc.
(310) 204-8300
All Rights Reserved.