|
Putin Fires Back and Pro-Western Critics
by John M. Curtis
(310) 204-8700
Copyright
May 24, 2014 All Rights Reserved.
Since invading Crimea March 1, 61-year-old
Russian President Vladimir Putin has been so demonized by the West that he’s
finally taken off the gloves and fired back.
When the Prince of Wales, Prince Charles, compared Putin’s moves in
Ukraine to Hitler in the 1930s May 22, the former KGB officer finally had
enough. “I would not like to think
this is the start of a new Cold War.
It is in no one’s interest and I think it will not happen,” Putin told
Reuters, rejecting claims in the U.S. that he seeks to reinstate the former
Soviet Union. Holding his own
economic summit in St. Petersburg, now that he’s been evicted from the G7, Putin
vowed to not let Western sanctions sink the Russian economy, now teetering on
recession. Putin seeks a new
trading block with Kazakhstan, Belarus and other former satellites, all part of
the once powerful Soviet Union before it disbanded in 1991.
Putin fired back about the unlawful Feb. 22 Western-backed coup that
toppled the pro-Russian government of Viktor Yanukovich, driving the Ukraine
into civil war. “They try to stick
this label on use—a label that we are trying to restore an empire, the Soviet
Union, make everyone subordinates.
This absolutely does not correspond to reality,” said Putin, rejecting White
House and Capitol Hill claims that Putin’s Russian Federation seeks to dominate
the region. White House officials
accuse Putin of meddling in Ukrainian politics, backing pro-separatist groups,
causing much of the unrest that Putin views as a civil war. Firing back at his critics, Putin
said the U.S. and European Union backed the Ukrainian coup that threw the
country into chaos and civil war.
U.S. and EU officials contend that Putin seeks to dominate the region, including
countries like Moldova that lean more toward the EU.
After five years in office, 52-year-old President Barack Obama hasn’t
mastered East-West relations, often criticizing Putin’s actions in Ukraine,
while not paying attention to U.S. moves in Afghanistan and Iraq. “Who made him a judge?” asked Putin about Obama, who’s criticized Putin for backing
pro-separatists in Ukraine. Putin
reminded his critics that Russian didn’t start the Feb. 22 coup that threw the
region into anarchy, exposing deep divisions between Western and Eastern
Ukraine. Putin rejected attempts by
Obama to isolate Russia for its actions in Ukraine. While Obama accuses Putin of
meddling in Eastern Ukraine, Putin points out that it was the U.S. and EU-backed
coup that opened up the hornet’s nest.
U.S. and EU officials need to find common ground with Putin, not continue
to antagonize relations by voting for more harsh economic and travel sanctions.
Russian, like the U.S. and EU, has every right to try to influence
elections in former Soviet republics, currently trying to figure out which
direction to take in a post-Soviet Union atmosphere. Putin told pro-separatist forces in
Eastern Ukraine that the Russian Federation would back Ukraine’s duly elected
government, not try to annex more Ukrainian territory. Russian-speaking populations in
Eastern Ukraine would like the Russian Federation to rescue their dismal
economy. Putin put pro-Russian
separatists on notice May 7 to hold off on separatist votes, knowing the Kremlin
would not back taking any more Ukrainian territory. With Western economic sanctions
taking their toll on Moscow, Putin thought twice before offering to annex more
Ukrainian territory. He also
reflected back on the costs to the former Soviet Union of subsidizing satellite
states before backing separatist votes.
Before Putin annexed Crimea March 1, U.S.-Russian relations had already
sunk to post-Cold War low. Acting
to protect Russian interests in Crimea, including Russia’s Black Sea naval base
in Sevastopol, Putin didn’t trust Ukraine’s anti-Russian rulers from meeting
commitments and treaty obligations.
Seizing Crimea reflected the will of pro-Russian speakers looking for a way out
of Ukraine’s disastrous economy, owing billions to Moscow for energy purchases. When Yanukovich accepted Putin’s $16
billion bailout Nov. 30, 2013, the Western-backed protest movement went rabid,
culminating in the Feb. 22 coup.
Even if Ukraine’s 48-year-old chocolate baron Petro Poroshenko wins tomorrow’s
election, he’s still faced with rebuilding an economy buried in debt, currently
in shambles. When he looks East or
West, he’ll find no quick-fix to Ukraine’s economic nightmare.
Demonized by the West for his
evil “Soviet” intent of dominating Eastern Europe, Putin has every right tot set
the record straight about what really happened in Kiev Feb. 22. No Ukrainian leader can offer
pie-in-the-sky without leveling about the way forward with the help of the East
or West. Putin’s Russian Federation
still represents an essential energy trading partner to Europe and global
partner to the U.S. containing the rising tide on Islamic extremism around the
planet. It does no one any good pitting
the U.S. and EU against Putin’s Russian Federation. “The world is really changing rapidly. We see colossal geopolitical, technological and structural shifts. The unipolar model of world order has
failed,” said Putin, referring to the U.S. trying to dominate the planet. With all the pressing global issues, U.S.
and EU officials should reconsider pitting the West against the Russian
Federation
|