Putin Warns Urkaine on Military Intervention
by John M. Curtis
(310) 204-8700
Copyright
May 1, 2014 All Rights Reserved.
Russian President Vladimir Putin warned Kiev’s post-revolutionary leaders
to end its military adventure in Eastern Ukraine, trying to reclaim territory
lost to pro-Russian separatists. Accepting a legitimate revolt against Ukraine’s new leaders, Putin sees things
differently from Washington and Brussels, who see Russia violating Ukraine’s
territorial integrity. When Putin
seized Crimea March 1, Washington and Brussels convulsed, not realizing the Feb.
22 anti-Russian coup that toppled the elected government of Viktor Yanukovich
was illegal by anyone’s metrics. White House and European Union officials were quick to jump on the pro-Western bandwagon
of newly minted 49-year-old Ukrainian President Oleksandr Turchinov and
39-year-old Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk.
Putin sees the unrest in Eastern Ukraine as a rebellion against Ukraine’s
post-revolutionary leaders.
President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry have shown no
regard for Russia’s position that they don’t recognize Ukriane’s upstart
anti-Kremlin leadership. Punishing
Moscow with economic sanctions hasn’t stopped Putin from warning Kiev that more
military action against Russian speakers in Eastern Ukraine might trigger the
Russian military to cross into Eastern Ukraine.
Obama and Kerry blame Putin for all unrest in Eastern Ukraine when
Russian-speaking citizen’s don’t support Ukraine’s pro-Western government. Putin watched with his hands tied
hosting the Sochi Winter Olympics watching a pro-Western coup led by 42-year-old
former heavyweight boxing champion Vitale Klitschko drive Yanukovich out of Kiev
Feb. 22. Once the games ended Feb.
23, it took Putin only a week to seize Crimea March 1 in response to the
U.S.-EU-backed coup.
Putin told German Chancellor Angel Merkel that the government’s
anti-terrorist operations in Eastern Ukraine shouldn’t harm Eastern Ukrainian
citizens. With Turchinov re-upping
the draft, he hopes to have better luck than Ukraine’s voluntary military that
refused to fight in Eastern Urkaine.
Pro-Russian separatists have taken over the regional capital city of
Donetsk. Seizing the regional
prosecutors office, hundreds of anti-Kiev separatists seized government
buildings with little resistance.
Ukrainian military, paramilitary and police officials refused to fight the
pro-Russian militiamen. Once the
political center of Yanukovich’s power, Donetsk shows no signs of acquiescing to
government demands, forcing Kiev to threaten a new draft. U.S. and EU officials haven’t
admitted the anti-Kiev protests were not orchestrated by the Kremlin but by
locals refusing to accept Kiev’s new leadership.
Just 110 kilometers [70 miles] from Donetsk, pro-Kremlin protesters in
Slovyansk show no signs of backing the Kiev government. Turchinov’s anti-terrorist
operations or new draft won’t change locals’ loyalty to the Kremlin. Organization for Security and
Cooperation officials remain under pro-Russian custody. Merkel asked Putin to have the OSCE
officials released into U.N. custody.
“The continuing hostage-taking of the OSCE observers by separatists in
Eastern Ukraine” must stop, according to Merkel’s spokeswoman Christine Wirtz. Wirtz hoped that Putin would prevail
on the separatist to free OSCE hostages. If Obama and Merkel want Putin to cooperate, they need to end the sanctions and draw up
plans to remove Turchinov and Yatsenyuk from power. Agreeing on suitable replacements to
both Kiev and Estern Ukraine would be the first order of business to end the
crisis.
Calls for Obama to take tougher action in Ukraine grow louder on Capitol
Hill with Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) calling for
the U.S. to arm the Ukrainian military.
Not one U.S. official can explain the national security significance of
the Ukraine, other than dredging up the obsolete Communist domino theory. Putin’s issues with Crimea and
Ukraine go back to Tzarist Russia, before the 1912 Bolshevik revolution led to
the 1922 Soviet Union. U.S. and
especially the EU have far more cooperative business relationships with Moscow
on energy, regional security, nuclear cooperation and global terrorism to simply
restart the Cold War. Whatever
happened Feb. 22 in Ukraine, it’s up to Moscow, Kiev and Eastern Ukraine to find
an acceptable fix. Taking sides
simply to oppose the Kremlin doesn’t benefit U.S. foreign policy or national
security.
Threats by Kiev to re-up the draft to send troops into harm’s way in
Eastern Ukraine will only push Putin to do what he did to Georgia in 2008, seize
about 20% of Georgia’s sovereign territory.
U.S. and EU officials need to accept the reality in Eastern Ukraine that
they don’t want Kiev’s new post-revolutionary anti-Russian regime. If the U.S. and EU wish to be helpful, they need to work with Moscow to find consensus
leaders that can govern Kiev and Eastern Ukraine or face the very real prospects
of partitioning the country. “The
main thing was for Ukraine to withdraw its troops from Southeastern Ukraine,
stop the violence and quickly star a broad national dialogue on constitutional
reform,” said the Kremlin, offering a way out of the current crisis. As long as Turchinov and Yatsenyuk
remain in power, there’s no stopping the current civil war that’s split the
country.
|