Geneva Talks Offer Band-Aid on Ukraine
by John M. Curtis
(310) 204-8700
Copyright
April 17 2014 All Rights Reserved.
Agreeing to give amnesty to pro-Russian separatists
that seized facilities in Eastern Ukraine, Secretary of State 70-year-old John
Kerry and 64-year-old Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov shook hands to
deescalate tensions in Ukraine while resolving nothing about basic issues of
Ukrainian sovereignty. Kerry and
Lavrov papered over the big issue related to legitimate rule of Ukraine. United States and European Union
jumped at the chance of backing the Feb. 22 anti-Russian coup that toppled the
government of 64-year-old Viktor Yanukovich.
Putin categorically rejects Ukraine’s post-revolutionary government led
by 49-year-old pro-EU President Oleksandr Turchinov and 39-year-old Prime
Minister Arseniy Katsenyuk. Meeting
in Geneva today to defuse tensions, Kerry and Lavrov avoided the most basic
issues related to resolving the Ukrainian crisis.
Whatever events led to Ukraine’s Feb. 22 coup, the Kremilin doesn’t
recognize Kiev’s post-revolutionary government.
Agreeing on amnesty for Russian separatists in Eastern Ukraine doesn’t
begin to address the failure of Kiev’s government to command the Ukrainian
military in Eastern Ukraine. Ukrainian
soldiers have refused to move against their Ukrainian brothers in the Southeast. Putin sees Crimea and Eastern
Ukraine as “New Russia,” the same name given to it when it was conquered by the
Russian Empire in the 1700s.
Seizing Crimea March 1 and annexing the territory March 16, Putin views Eastern
Ukraine in the same light. With over 40,000 troops on the border, Russia
reserves its right to protect the Russian-speaking population. Putin sees nothing wrong with
seizing more Ukrainian territory, justifying actions to protect Russian-speaking
Ukrainian citizens.
Putin’s real issue with Ukraine’s post-revolutionary government involves
the EU and U.S.-backed coup that encroached on Russian interests and national
security. “I remind you that the
Federation Council has give the president the right to use armed forces in
Ukraine,” said Putin, raising more concerns in the Eastern provinces the Russian
army would soon seize more territory.
“I really hope that I do not have to exercise this right and that by
political and diplomatic means we well be able solve all of the sharp problems,”
said Putin, telling Kerry and EU Foreign Policy Chief Catherine Ashton that the
current situation is untenable.
Putin’s use of the term “Novprossiya” or “New Russia” shows that he sees Crimea
and Eastern Ukraine as a part of Russia.
Putin sees the Feb. 22 coup in Kiev as proof of Western interference in
the Southern flank of the Russian Federation
Doing nothing substantive to change situation in Ukraine, Kerry and
Lavrov avoided painful steps toward reconciliation: Forcing Turchinov and Katsenyuk’s
resignations. Ukraine’s
post-revolutionary government remains unacceptable to the Kremlin. While Putn’s savvy enough to know he
can’t return Yanukovich to Kiev, Kerry and Lavrov avoided any discussion of
filling the leadership void. With
the Ukrainian military refusing to follow Kiev’s orders in reclaiming parts of
Eastern Ukraine, it’s obvious that Turchivov and Yatsenyuk don’t represent a
majority of Ukrainians, certainly not residents of the country’s Southwest. U.S.-Russian relations go beyond
today’s squabbles in Ukraine.
Finding a mutually beneficial fix is in everyone’s best interests, not just
Russia. Asking Turchinov and
Yatsenyuk to step down would be a positive first step.
Kerry and Lavrov must do better than gloss over the real issues for
resolving the Ukrainian crisis. If
the U.S. and EU really want change, they need to recognize that the current
regime doesn’t represent the Ukrainian people.
If you ask what happened to leader pro-EU demonstrator former heavyweight
champion Vitali Klitshkho, you’ll see how the anti-Russian protests fizzled out. Yanukovich’s Nov. 29, 2013 economic
decision to scrap an agreement with the EU in favor of one with Moscow couldn’t
possibly have led to the Feb. 22 coup.
Whether or not the EU or Russia retires Ukrainian debt should be an
internal matter not one of a coup d’etat.
Klitshkho’s disappearance speaks volumes about how he vanished when the
stakes got too high. How Ukraine’s
current leaders came to powers is anyone’s guess? It’s obvious they don’t represent
the Ukrainian people.
Hitting a low-point since the Cold War, U.S. officials should look at the
big picture of improving U.S.-Russian relations.
Slapping Russia with more sanctions turns back the clock on U.S.-Russian
relations but, more importantly, fails to see how the Feb. 22 coup encroached on
Russian national security. If Putin
feels strongly that he can’t do business with Ukraine’s post-revolutionary
leaders, then the time has come to stop battling the Kremlin and find new
leaders. It’s obvious that
Turchinov and Yatsesyuk don’t command the Ukrainian military. “The question is
to ensure the rights and interests of the Russian Southeast. It’s New Russia, Kharkiv, Lugansk,
Donetsk, Odessa were not part of Ukraine in Tsarist times, they were transferred
in 1920 . . .” said Putin, disputing Ukrainian sovereignty. If new leaders were in place
representing all Ukrainians, the current crisis would end.
|